| MSc thesis, Case | Student submitted thesis to evaluaiton (according to info I have) | Request for supervising professor (me) to evaluate came from CHEM school on | CHEM school requests the evaluation to be submitted latest on | I as supervising professor have asked advisors feedback on | I requested advisor’s feedback by |
| A | 2025-06-13 | 2025-06-17 | 2025-08-19 | 2025-06-18 | 2025-08-04 |
| B | 2025-06-30 | 2025-06-30 | 2025-08-19 | 2025-07-15 | –*** |
| C | 2025-07-16 | 2025-07-22 | 2025-08-19 | 2025-07-25 | 2025-08-10 |
| D | 2025-07-28 | 2025-07-28 | 2025-08-19 | 2025-08-11* | 2025-08-17** |
| *I was on off-duty period from 2025-07-28 onwards, for two weeks |
| **Or by the end of the following week, if this due date comes too fast |
| ***I tried to send the request via Student success hub. I may not gave given a due date. Student success hub request did not provide the form with which the advisors should give the feedback, so for this (and all other) cases I have provided it separately by email. I have had to request the form separately from the learning services, as the form does not come together with the evaluation request. |
***
Update 2025-08-14: Link to a document prepared by me and included in the minutes of the CHEM School’s Academic Committee (KTAK) meeting 2/2025 as Attachment 12 under Item 11 Any other business, embedded here. Full meeting minutes can be found via https://www.aalto.fi/en/management-of-school-of-chemical-engineering/academic-committee-for-chemical-engineering-ktak.
